Bill Analysis
Legislative Service Commission
(3) At least one-half of the renewable energy resources implemented by the utility or company by the end of 2025 must be met through facilities located in Ohio. Renewable energy compliance payments The PUCO annually must review a utility's or company's compliance with the most recent applicable benchmark for renewable and solar energy resources under the bill. If the PUCO determines, after notice and a hearing, that the utility or company has failed to comply with the bill's renewable or solar energy resource benchmarks, the PUCO must impose a renewable energy compliance payment on the utility or company. The compliance payment must be remitted to the PUCO for deposit to the credit of the Renewable Energy Development and Investment Fund created in the bill and is subject to collection and enforcement procedures that apply to the collection of forfeitures under current PUCO law.[7] The utility or company cannot pass any compliance payments through to consumers. Compliance payments for failure to meet solar energy resource benchmarks. The bill requires that compliance payments for failure to meet solar energy resource benchmarks must be an amount per megawatt hour of undercompliance or noncompliance in the period under review starting at $450 for 2009, $400 for 2010 and 2011, and similarly reduced by $50 every two years thereafter through 2024. Compliance payments for failure to meet renewable resource energy benchmarks. The bill specifies that compliance payments for failure to meet the renewable energy resource benchmarks must equal $45 times the number of additional renewable energy credits that the utility would have needed to comply with the applicable benchmark in the period under review. Review of alternative energy market The bill requires the PUCO to establish a process to provide for the review of the alternative energy market in Ohio and the service territories of the regional transmission organizations that manage transmission systems located in the state.[8] Under the bill, the review must take place at least annually, and the PUCO must use the results of this study to identify any needed changes to the amount of the renewable energy compliance payment under the bill. The PUCO may increase the amount to ensure that payment of compliance payments is not used to achieve compliance in lieu of actually acquiring or realizing energy derived from renewable energy resources. If the PUCO finds, however, that the amount of the compliance payment should be otherwise changed, the PUCO must present this finding to the General Assembly for legislative enactment. Compliance report The PUCO annually must submit to the General Assembly a report describing the compliance of electric distribution utilities and electric services companies with the alternative energy requirements under the bill. The report must also describe any strategy for utility and company compliance or for encouraging the use of alternative energy in supplying Ohio's electricity needs in a manner that considers available technology, costs, job creation, and economic impacts. The PUCO must allow and consider public comments on the report prior to its submission to the General Assembly. Nothing in the report will be binding on any person, including any utility or company, for the purpose of its compliance with any benchmarks or enforcement provisions under the bill. Alternative Energy Advisory Committee The Governor, in consultation with the PUCO chairperson, must appoint an Alternative Energy Advisory Committee. The Committee must examine available technology for and related timetables, goals, and costs of the alternative energy requirements under the bill. The bill requires the Committee to submit a semiannual report of its recommendations to the PUCO. Cost recovery for alternative energy The bill requires that all costs incurred by a utility in complying with the alternative energy requirements must be bypassable by any consumer that has exercised choice of supplier under the Competitive Retail Electric Service Law.[9] Renewable energy credits (R.C. 4928.65) Under the bill, an electric distribution utility or an electric services company may use renewable energy credits for the purpose of complying with the renewable and solar energy resources requirements. The PUCO must adopt rules specifying that one unit of credit is equal to one megawatt hour of electricity derived from renewable energy resources. The rules also must provide for the state a system of registering renewable energy credits by specifying which of any generally available registries must be used for that purpose and not by creating a registry. Energy efficiency (R.C. 4928.66) The bill requires that beginning in 2009, an electric distribution utility, as well as the Director of Development, must implement energy efficiency programs designed to achieve reductions in energy usage by 0.3% that same year, increasing an additional 0.5% in 2010, 0.7% in 2011, 0.8% in 2012, 0.9% in 2013, 1.0% from 2014 to 2018, and 2.0% each year thereafter, achieving a cumulative energy reduction in excess of 22% by 2025. Also beginning in 2009, an electric distribution utility must implement peak demand reduction programs designed to achieve a 1% reduction in peak demand in 2009 and an additional .75% reduction each year through 2018. In 2018, the standing committees in the House of Representatives and the Senate primarily dealing with energy issues must make recommendations to the General Assembly regarding future peak demand reduction targets.[10] Programs implemented by a utility under the energy efficiency provisions of the bill described above may include demand-response programs and transmission and distribution infrastructure improvements that reduce line losses. Annual report In accordance with rules it must adopt under the bill, the PUCO, must produce and docket at the PUCO an annual report containing the results of its verification of the annual levels of energy usage and peak demand reductions achieved by each electric distribution utility. A copy of the report must be provided to the Consumers' Counsel. Noncompliance If the PUCO determines, after notice and hearing and based upon its annual report, that an electric distribution utility has failed to comply with an energy usage or peak demand reduction required under the bill, the PUCO must assess a forfeiture on the utility as provided in current PUCO law.[11] The forfeiture must be either: (1) in the amount, per day per undercompliance or noncompliance, relative to the period of the report, equal to that prescribed for noncompliances under current law, or (2) in an amount equal to the then existing market value of one renewable energy credit per megawatt hour of undercompliance or noncompliance. Revenue from forfeitures assessed for energy efficiency and peak demand reduction requirements under the bill must be deposited to the credit of the Renewable Energy Development and Development Fund created by the bill. Customer requests for consumption data The PUCO must adopt rules that require an electric distribution utility to provide a consumer upon request with two years' consumption data in an accessible form. Decoupling mechanism and cost recovery Rules adopted by the PUCO may also provide for a decoupling mechanism that must provide a utility reasonable recovery of lost revenue resulting from its promotion of energy efficiency to consumers.[12] In approving such mechanism for a utility, the PUCO must consider whether the utility should maintain its weather risk and must consider appropriate consumer protections that ensure that the utility's rates or prices are just and reasonable, including such protections as a cap on any percentage rate or price increase under the mechanism or on any increase in overall rates or prices resulting from the mechanism. The rules may also provide, subject to notice and hearing, for a utility for which a decoupling mechanism has not been authorized to receive just and reasonable recovery of costs the utility incurs in meeting the energy efficiency and peak demand reductions required by the bill. Geologic storage of carbon dioxide (R.C. 1572.01 and 1572.02) The bill establishes a regulatory framework that allows for the geologic storage of "carbon dioxide" defined in the bill as anthropogenically sourced carbon dioxide of sufficient purity and quality as not to compromise the safety and efficiency of an underground reservoir to contain the carbon dioxide effectively. The bill declares that the Division of Mineral Resources Management in the Department of Natural Resources has exclusive authority to regulate the geologic storage of carbon dioxide in Ohio and must administer the geologic carbon dioxide storage program established under the bill. The bill defines "geologic storage" to mean the permanent or short-term underground storage of carbon dioxide in an underground reservoir (see "Storage facility permits," below). Storage facility permits (R.C. 1572.01 and 1572.02) Under the bill, a person seeking to operate a storage facility in Ohio must apply for a permit to do so from the Chief of the Division of Mineral Resources Management in accordance with the bill. The bill defines "storage facility" to mean the underground reservoir, underground equipment, and surface buildings and equipment utilized in the subsurface storage of carbon dioxide, excluding any pipelines used to transport the carbon dioxide from one or more capture facilities to the storage facility. "Storage facility" may include an enhanced oil recovery or natural gas operation. Under the bill, "storage operator" is defined to mean an individual, corporation, partnership, limited liability company, or other entity authorized by the Division of Mineral Resources Management to operate a storage facility in Ohio. "Underground reservoir" is defined to mean a subsurface sedimentary stratum, formation, aquifer, cavity, or void, naturally or artificially created, including an oil or natural gas reservoir, saline formation, or coal seam suitable or capable of being made suitable for the injection and storage of carbon dioxide. "Underground reservoir" includes any necessary and reasonable areal buffer and subsurface monitoring zone designated by the Division for the purposes of ensuring the safe and efficient operation of a storage facility and protecting against pollution and the invasion, escape, or migration of carbon dioxide. The Chief must issue a permit under the bill only if all of the following apply: (1) The storage facility is suitable and feasible for the injection and storage of carbon dioxide; (2) A good faith effort has been made by the permit applicant to obtain the consent of a majority of the owners of property interests that will be affected by the storage facility, and the applicant has obtained remaining property interests by eminent domain (see "Eminent domain," below); (3) The use of the storage facility for the geologic storage of carbon dioxide will not contaminate resources containing fresh water, oil, natural gas, coal, or other commercial mineral deposits; and (4) The storage will not unduly endanger human health and the environment. In issuing a permit, the Chief may include terms and conditions in the permit that the Chief determines to be necessary. With respect to each parcel of property that is affected by the issuance of a permit under the bill, the Chief must cause a copy of the permit to be filed and recorded in the office of the county recorder of the county in which the parcel is located. In addition, prior to injecting any carbon dioxide into a storage facility pursuant to a permit issued under the bill, the storage operator must cause to be filed and recorded in the office of the applicable county recorder and with the Division of Mineral Resources Management a statement that the storage operator has acquired by purchase, lease, eminent domain, or otherwise all of the necessary property rights with respect to the storage facility that is the subject of the permit. The filing must include the date on which carbon dioxide will commence being injected into the storage facility. Rules (R.C. 1572.03) The bill requires the Chief to adopt rules in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act that establish all of the following: (1) Application procedures for permits issued under the bill and procedures for the issuance or denial of an application for a permit; (2) The amount of the application fee that must be submitted with the application, which under the bill must be deposited to the credit of the Carbon Dioxide Storage Facility Trust Fund (see "Carbon Dioxide Storage Facility Trust Fund," below); (3) Requirements applicable to storage operators for obtaining the approval of the Chief prior to appropriating property interests under the bill (see "Eminent domain," below); (4) Financial assurance requirements for the proper maintenance, well plugging, and abandonment of a storage facility by a storage operator and to protect the storage facility against pollution and the invasion, escape, or migration of carbon dioxide. The financial assurance requirements may include a requirement that a storage operator purchase a surety bond or other financial surety. (5) Penalties and procedures for the enforcement of the applicable provisions of the bill and rules adopted under them, including civil penalties that may be imposed on any person violating any applicable provision of the bill or of rules adopted or terms and conditions of a permit issued under them, which under the bill must be deposited to the credit of the Carbon Dioxide Storage Facility Trust Fund (see "Carbon Dioxide Storage Facility Trust Fund," below); (6) The amount of a fee to be charged by the Division and paid by a storage operator for each ton of carbon dioxide that is injected into a storage facility by the storage operator. The rules must require that the proceeds from the fee be deposited in the state treasury to the credit of the Carbon Dioxide Storage Facility Trust Fund (see "Carbon Dioxide Storage Facility Trust Fund," below). (7) Closure requirements applicable to storage facilities upon the completion of carbon dioxide injection operations at a storage facility. The rules must require the Division to issue a certificate of completion of injection operations upon the termination of carbon dioxide injection at a storage facility and its successful closure. The rules must require that not later than ten years, or another time frame specified by rule, after the issuance of a certificate, upon a showing by the storage operator that the storage facility is reasonably expected to retain its mechanical integrity and remain emplaced, the ownership of the storage facility transfers to the state. The rules also must provide that upon the transfer of ownership, the storage operator, and any generator of carbon dioxide that was injected into the storage facility by the storage operator, are released from liability with respect to the storage facility and that any long-term monitoring or remediation of any leakage at the storage facility becomes the responsibility of the state. (8) A long-term monitoring program for the purposes of the monitoring storage facilities, remediation of mechanical problems associated with storage facilities and surface infrastructure, repairing mechanical leaks at storage facilities, and plugging and abandonment of wells that are associated with storage facilities; (9) Procedures for allowing the conversion of enhanced recovery of oil or natural gas operations into a storage facility; and (10) Any other requirements or procedures that are determined necessary by the Chief in order to implement the applicable provisions of the bill. Eminent domain (R.C. 1572.04) The bill authorizes a storage operator, subject to rules adopted under the bill, to appropriate, in accordance with current law governing the exercise of eminent domain, surface and subsurface rights and interests in land, including easements and rights-of-way, that are necessary for both of the following: (1) The operation of a storage facility; and (2) The transporting of carbon dioxide among facilities constituting a storage facility. Notwithstanding the eminent domain authority established in the bill, no property rights in a storage facility may be acquired pursuant to the bill's eminent domain authority. Use of state highway lands (R.C. 5501.452) Under the bill, the Director of Transportation is required to implement a program allowing, by lease or permit, the use of lands owned by the state and acquired or used for the state highway system, for highways, in connection with highways, or as incidental to the acquisition of land for highways by any person operating a pipeline that is necessary for the operation of a carbon dioxide storage facility regulated under the bill. For the purposes of this provision, "operation of a storage facility" includes operation for the purpose of transporting carbon dioxide by pipeline from its source for injection into the storage facility. The program must be operated in accordance with guidelines developed by the Department of Transportation and in effect on January 1, 1996. The bill provides, however, that nothing in that provision requires the Director to maintain a lease or permit at a specific location or prohibits the Director from modifying the terms of a specific lease or permit. Carbon Dioxide Storage Facility Trust Fund (R.C. 1572.06) The bill creates in the state treasury the Carbon Dioxide Storage Facility Trust Fund to be administered by the Division of Mineral Resources Management. The Fund is required to consist of the proceeds of the fees established in rules adopted under the bill and of civil penalties imposed for violations under the bill. Money in the Fund must be used by the Division for the administration of the applicable provisions of the bill and for funding for the long-term monitoring of storage facilities as provided in rules adopted under the bill. Cooperative agreements with state and federal governments (R.C. 1572.05) The bill authorizes the Director of Natural Resources to enter into cooperative agreements with the federal government and other states that the Division of Mineral Resources Management determines to be necessary for the purpose of regulating carbon dioxide storage projects. Inapplicability to oil and gas recovery operations (R.C. 1572.07) The bill declares that nothing in the applicable provisions of the bill or in rules adopted under them applies to the use of carbon dioxide as part of or in conjunction with any enhanced recovery of oil or natural gas where the sole purpose of the project is the recovery of oil or natural gas. Exemption of carbon dioxide from existing gas storage program (R.C. 1571.01) Current law establishes a regulatory program for the underground storage of certain gases. The bill exempts from that program the underground injection of carbon dioxide that is regulated under the bill. Greenhouse gas emissions, carbon control (R.C. 4928.69) Greenhouse gases The bill requires the PUCO to adopt rules establishing greenhouse gas emission reporting requirements for each electric generating facility located in Ohio that emits greenhouse gases, including facilities in operation on the bill's effective date (see COMMENT).[13] The rules must include participation in the Climate Registry. The Registry's web site describes the Registry as "a collaboration between states, provinces, and tribes aimed at developing and managing a common greenhouse gas emissions reporting system with high integrity that is capable of supporting various greenhouse gas emissions reporting and reduction policies for its member states and tribes and reporting entities."[14] The bill does not address the relationship between the required PUCO rules and any authority of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding greenhouse gas control. The Ohio EPA currently does not have any rules regarding reporting by any type of emitter of greenhouse gases, which include, but are not limited to, electric generating facilities. A recent federal act requires the U.S. EPA to prescribe mandatory reporting requirements for greenhouse gas emissions and appropriate emission thresholds for particular economic sectors, including electric generation. Draft rules are expected this summer and final rules must be in place in mid-2009. The rules apparently will be issued under existing authority of the federal Clean Air Act, under which Ohio EPA typically is the implementing state agency. Reportedly, other state agencies that wish to enforce such federal rules must petition the federal government for permission. Carbon control The bill requires the PUCO to adopt rules establishing carbon control planning requirements for each electric generating facility located in Ohio that emits greenhouse gases, including facilities in operation on the bill's effective date. (The reference to "carbon control" likely means "carbon dioxide control.") There currently are no such federal or state requirements, and none are being proposed for the foreseeable future. The bill does not describe the scope of the carbon control planning requirements, for example, whether the rules will be directed at the filing of long-term plans or address technology standards. COMMENT The bill is not clear as to whom the PUCO's greenhouse gas reporting and carbon control planning requirements under R.C. 4928.68 will apply, that is, as to public utilities the PUCO regulates and/or other owners of electric generation. If it includes the latter, there is no authority under current law or the bill for the PUCO to enforce compliance as to those nonutility owners. HISTORY